Hi Caterina,

I have experienced "gotcha" moments so I understand why you might think that looking from an outside perspective. Your comment does feel a bit loaded with judgements too. Thanks for joining in though, we are aware there are thousands of people who read Openhand but never get in touch. Nice to meet you

That wasn't at all my experience here. My biggest take away when I left the circle was that it was "made for our group" and carried messages for us. I didn't have a feeling on who made it, but it felt very human to me with it depicting a man made object, so much so I was left questioning, "Would the ingenious architects of sacred geometry really depict such a simple tool?" Was this a departure from the norm? Being wrapped in such perfect synchronicities, and my appreciation of that seemed to mask the obvious conclusion for me. When I heard that it was man made it didn't have any effect of destabilisation as my feeling that it was perfectly timed and made for us remained completely intact - this was just a very different way of delivering the circle! Which then actually made sense of the individual questions we each had lingering but had not yet put together.

It was able to convey a rather different set of lessons by being man made, and will enable us all to pay more attention to the unanswered questions next time. It absolutely felt friendly and benevolent in it's assistance with our understandings going to deeper levels.

Tilly