In reply to by Open

Comment

Another conversation I had with someone on Ascension Exchanges yesterday was how they were angry about losing money when recommended to go into crypto. Clearly they went into crypto for the wrong reason. What do I mean?

If you went in simply to make money, then that's missing the point. It's just like anything else - a game of self-realisation, where the movement of numbers reveal so much about the inner configuration of self: what is loss? what is true gain? Am I prepared to take risk? What is calculated risk? How do you value something? How much are you prepared to commit yourself to break injustice? Who are you in relation to the value of money? What are you worth? How easily do you sell your soul?

For me, crypto was never about money per se. I could see the injustice of the banking system, how it fleeces people and keeps their noses to the grindstone. If only humanity would summon the courage to turn away. In each country, each state, county or town, (as in Totnes in the UK for example) the people could simply decide to have their own currency and trade at an agreed true value - where they're not being ripped off by the system. Where their hard-earned money isn't being artificially deflated to pay the banksters, big tech and big pharma. Where their hard earned money isn't being squandered to pay for bogus wars to control energy.

It reached a peak during the credit crunch of 2008. Iceland for example went bust, but refused to accept blackmailing loans from the International Money Fund, which would control them. Instead they locked the banksters up, sacked the government and elected a new one across the internet, by the people of the people. Just as all countries could if the people dared to take a stand.

Crypto is a rebellion, where every coin exchanged is a statement of personal freedom and sovereignty.

Also in 2008, after the credit crunch, along came Bitcoin. I instantly knew this was an important development in the shift and overturning the shadow. I was telling people about it in 2012/13, when it was only a few hundred dollars. People were wary of getting in then, but look at it now.

They'll be saying the same in 5 years' time, and wondering "why I didn't get in way back when".

Yes, it's risky. But that's also the nature of enlightenment. There is no gain without risk.
Enlightenment is not a safe practice!

Open 💎

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.